Tag Archives: climate change

Rediscovering the Sacred in the Natural World

Can we learn from history to restore our shattered ecosystems? This is the compelling question Sophie Yeo explores in her book Nature’s Ghosts.

Humanity has been reshaping the natural world ever since the transition from hunter-gatherer societies to agriculture, some 10,000 years ago. Forests were cleared, wetlands drained and landscapes transformed to make room for crops and permanent settlements.

What began as a gradual reshaping of our surroundings has, over millennia, evolved into an unprecedented disruption of the delicate ecosystems on which all life depends. Yet history may hold valuable clues to how we can begin to repair the damage and restore a more harmonious relationship with the natural world.

Before the agricultural revolution, human communities generally lived much closer to the rhythms of nature. Their relationship with the environment was one of immediate dependence, interaction and, in many cases, reverence. Even until relatively recent times, cultures across the world regarded trees, rivers and mountains not simply as resources but as living presences, deserving of respect and sometimes even worship.

There was an understanding, deeply embedded in many traditional belief systems, that humanity was not separate from nature but belonged to a much larger web of life.

The Earth’s climate, as Yeo’s research reminds us, has always undergone dramatic changes. Species have disappeared, others have adapted, and entire ecosystems have been transformed in response to shifting conditions. But never before has human activity altered the natural world on such an extensive scale and at such speed. The burning of fossil fuels is accelerating climate change, while plastics, nuclear waste, pesticides and countless other pollutants will remain in the environment for generations, in some cases for thousands of years.

This raises a fundamental question: why are we destroying the very environment on which our survival depends?

One explanation Yeo explores is our growing estrangement from nature. Rapid urbanisation and the transformation of modern lifestyles have gradually distanced us from the natural world. For many people, nature has become something outside ourselves: a landscape to visit, a resource to exploit or an amenity to enjoy in our leisure time. We have lost something of the awareness that we are part of nature, not separate from it.

I would take this argument a step further and describe it as a spiritual disconnect.

For me, nature is an expression of the divine. Not necessarily in a religious or institutional sense, but as an experience of something greater than ourselves: the mysterious intelligence, interconnectedness, and creative force that permeates all living things. A tree growing towards the light, the intricate balance of an ecosystem, the changing seasons or the quiet persistence of life itself can all evoke a sense of wonder and belonging.

When we begin to see ourselves as part of this larger whole, our relationship with the natural world changes. It also changes our relationship with ourselves. Self-love and self-expression acquire a different meaning when we recognise that we are not isolated individuals, but expressions of the same living world. Caring for ourselves and caring for nature are no longer separate concerns. Both become ways of honouring life.

I was reminded of this during a visit to Kew Gardens in London last week. The gardens contain an extraordinary collection of endangered plants and trees from different parts of the world, many of them being carefully preserved and studied by dedicated scientists. I was particularly fascinated to learn that researchers are now using artificial intelligence to help identify and prioritise the species most at risk.

There is something deeply moving about this combination of ancient life, scientific knowledge and modern technology. It suggests that our relationship with nature need not be defined solely by exploitation and destruction. Human intelligence and ingenuity can also be placed in the service of protecting and sustaining life.

Perhaps the work at Kew Gardens points towards the kind of future Yeo envisages. One of the important lessons of ecological history is that ecosystems rarely return to precisely the state they were in before human intervention or environmental catastrophe. Once a habitat has been destroyed, the original combination of species and conditions may be impossible to recreate. But nature is remarkably resilient. It adapts, evolves and finds new ways of sustaining life.

This has important implications for how we approach environmental restoration. The challenge may not always be to recreate an idealised version of the past, but to help ecosystems adapt and flourish under changing conditions, including a warmer and increasingly unpredictable climate. History teaches us that insects, mammals and plants possess extraordinary capacities for adaptation, provided they are given the space and conditions to survive.

Perhaps the environmental movement has sometimes placed too much emphasis on apocalyptic scenarios and humanity’s role in destroying the natural world. The warnings are necessary, and the scale of the crisis should not be underestimated. But Yeo’s book also offers another perspective: human beings can be agents of restoration, not merely destruction.

We can become stewards of nature, using our knowledge, creativity and technological capabilities to protect biodiversity and help damaged ecosystems recover and transform.

Ultimately, I believe this requires more than scientific innovation, political will or changes in consumer behaviour. It calls for a shift in consciousness. We need to rediscover a sense of belonging to the natural world and recognise that its wellbeing is inseparable from our own.

Perhaps the most important lesson is also the simplest: we cannot truly care for what we perceive as separate from ourselves.

Rediscovering our spiritual connection with nature may therefore be as important to the future of our planet as the scientific and technological advances we bring to its protection.

Reino Gevers – Host of the LivingToBe podcast

P.S: If you enjoyed this article, you might be interested in reading one of my four books, available where all good books are sold.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Thought control? Hope springs

The Trump administration released the dire warning of its own climate scientists from 13 agencies during Thanksgiving, hoping it would be buried at a time when most people in the US are spending time with their families and eating Turkey.

Trump told reporters that he did not believe the study from the 300 climate experts after reading “some” of their conclusions. But  instead of hiding the bad news, Trump succeeded in really focusing attention on the matter.

At about the same time the Brazilian government published data telling us that deforestation in the Amazon rain forest had jumped to its worst rate in a decade. The New York Times also published an in-depth report on how fast the rain forests in Asia are disappearing to fulfill an insatiable demand for palm oil.

A huge consensus of the world’s best climate scientists have been telling us for years that we have a serious problem and that the earth will become uninhabitable for humans in half a century if humanity does not gets its act together in the next few years in doing something about climate change.

The climate scientists are telling us that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels is essential. Planting more trees, and keeping existing trees in the ground is essential if we want to meet that goal.

Only a small group of pseudo-scientists – nearly all of them funded by the fossil fuel industry- are in denial and pumping us with “thought control” fake news. It is much the same scenario that the world saw in the early 1960s when the tobacco industry paid “researchers” to deny the overwhelming evidence that smoking caused cancer. I don’t know how these people sleep at night or whether they really believe their own lies.

The danger is that when we hear all this bad news, it makes us fall into a paralytic state of in-action. What the anti-environmentalist governments in Brazil and the U.S. do is out of our control. The Amazon or Borneo is far away. We aren’t inhaling – yet – the smoke from all the burning forests.

Fact is that in our little worlds we can all do something. Here are only a few suggestions:

  • Each time we pick up a shampoo or cosmetic item in the supermarket we can check whether it contains palm oil.
  • Refuse to buy products equity or stock from agro-companies that are involved in deforestation. Check for the FSC label on sustainable forestry.
  • A vegan diet and food from the local organic farmer leaves the smallest carbon footprint. Mass animal production farms are dependent on monoculture farming that is destroying biodiversity.  For me personally a mainly vegetarian diet with a little organic meat every now and then is the best option.

Amid all the bad news, hope springs that we might after all get this climate issue solved if we really supported some very innovative ideas out there:

  • Dr. David Vaughan is a scientist who has achieved a breakthrough technology in bringing coral reefs back to life by making them grow up to 40 times faster than in the wild. Coral reefs are key to the ocean ecosystem and are major carbon sinks.
  •  Creating green roofs on skyscrapers in the major cities of the world could have a really positive effect in changing the micro-climate in urban areas and reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
  • Vertical farming in skyscrapers is a very effective way of providing fresh organic produce in cities, requiring much less land than conventional farming that is the second-largest emitter of carbon dioxide after the energy sector.  The Swedish company Plantagon is working on making a first prototype by constructing a 16-story building called The World Food Building that could serve as an international model for industrial urban farming.

Reino Gevers – Author, Mentor and Consultant

https://www.reinogevers.com

     

Leave a comment

Filed under climate, energy, lifestyle management, nutrition, spirituality, Thanksgiving, Uncategorized

A future without cars?

We just spent a couple of days on the southern North Sea island of Juist which was a bit like travelling back in time when the main means of transportation was by bike or horse-drawn carriage.

All that could wake you in the morning is the sound of seagulls or the passing of the odd horse and carriage on the cobblestone streets. Children are on the streets playing ball or driving go-carts.

Image  Image

The German island is just 17 kilometres long and half a kilometre wide. The only cars allowed are from the fire and rescue services. So it is quite an anomaly in a country known for its love affair with the motor car and virtually no speed limits on the autobahn.

Image   Image

The only other place I know that does completely without the car is Venice where there are no roads linking the network of islands. But Juist provides for even more solitude because you don’t hear the sounds of motor boats. I do enjoy motor cars and have a faible for the open-top classics of the 1950s and 1960s but it is time to rethink the role of transportation, especially in big cities where the quality of life has been ruined by congestion and smog.

The northern German port city of Hamburg has laid out plans to eliminate cars completely in the inner city during the next two decades, by creating a green network improving public transportation and the bicycle path network.

Several other big cities are rethinking the role of the motor car. London introduced a controversial congestion charge for vehicles driving into the city centre. New York has debated similar plans.

While in the 1970s the car was still the most efficient mode of transport, this has changed with traffic in most urban centres going at a stop-and-go pace. In many modern cities we are indeed today no faster than a horse-drawn carriage in the 19th century. We waste hours of our precious life-time in traffic jams.

Growing traffic density and the move from rural to urban areas in many developing countries is demanding a major rethink to our mode of transportation and maybe a future without cars.  We need to reoccupy our cities and make them more human again with green belts of parks and trees and a network of paths reserved for the bicycle or small electric vehicle.

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Living dangerously

We live close to one of Europe’s biggest rivers, the Elbe. Only six months ago we had an emergency situation here when floodwaters where threatening to flood our town, Bleckede, which is some 80 kilometres, southeast of the northern German port city of Hamburg. For several days thousands of people, some even coming from afar as Scandinavia, helped secure the dykes with sandbags. We were fortunate because the waters eventually broke through the dyke, lower downstream , easing the pressure. Others were not so lucky. Thousands of homes in eastern Germany were flooded, agricultural lands and infra-structure destroyed.

ImageImage

In April this year a groundbreaking TV series on the experiences and personal stories of people whose lives have been touched by climate change will be aired.  Years Of Living Dangerously is an eight-part series produced by famous film-makers James Cameron, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Weintraub. It is all about how climate change is affecting people everywhere here and now.

Here is the trailer: http://vimeo.com/78162825

 Lets hope that this storytelling-series will serve as a wake-up call! It is not something we cannot change. Global warming is a result of human actions – the burning of fossil fuels, the destruction of carbon sinks such as rainforests and swamps. For almost two centuries, coinciding with the industrial revolution, the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased dramatically.

Pre-industrial levels of carbon dioxide were about 280 parts per million (ppm), reflecting a long-term balance between natural processes that emit and that absorb carbon dioxide. This natural balance has been seriously upset. Currently the levels are at about 390 ppm and rising faster, despite efforts to bring the levels down to 1990 levels of about 350 ppm. Many people and governments out there are still in denial about climate change.

 Some very strange arguments are being put out on the Internet – that it is all fear-mongering by green activists or sunspot activity. Serious climate scientists are being attacked viciously by media sponsored by those who have most to lose, if we take the necessary steps in replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy. The “war” on climate scientists is vividly portrayed by a leading climate scientist Michael Mann in the book: “The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars.”

 We are indeed living dangerously. According to climatologists we have less than 15 years, if that, to bring carbon dioxide levels down to below 350 ppm. And that is only to avoid the worst effects of global warming.

I see many correlations between the climate debate and personal health issues. All the information is out there. We know that we are destroying the environment for future generations. We know that if we lead a certain lifestyle that we will most likely fall ill. So why aren’t we changing our habits? Why are we so much in denial about those things that seem so starkly obvious to the normal intelligent mind?

Maybe it is just part of human-instinct to avoid imagining the worst. “So what! I’m still around and enjoying life, so stop rocking the boat and disturbing me with your bad news.” The sad thing about both issues, is that we very often don’t see the catastrophe happening. It is a very slow process. Lung cancer doesn’t come overnight and after only smoking one cigarette. It is a result of many years of heavy smoking, stress and other factors.

 When the floodwaters came to Bleckede there were also people out there, initially doubting the situation. But when the floods were actually there, when the first homes were flooded and we could actually see with our own eyes kilometres of land under water, nearly everyone was stirred into action and wanted to do something. Lets hope that the positive human spirit will prevail.

 We are just a part of the bigger whole in the unity of things. It is comparable to the different salts found in blood and body tissue which correspond exactly to the 84 elements found in salt water. How we treat our planet and its fellow inhabitants is a reflection on how we are treating ourselves.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Venice, Climate change and denial

Venice is undoubtedly one of the world’s most beautiful cities. Walking these ancient streets and squares one cannot but be astounded by the architectural masterpieces built by the Venetians over the centuries.

 

The Basilica of San Marco overlooks one of the most beautiful squares in the world. It is the main tourist attraction and a favourite backdrop to many a movie. Unforgettable the scene from “Moonraker”: After being pursued by Drax’s henchmen down the canals in Venice, James Bond approaches St. Marks Square on a gondola. He activates a skirt on the boat, turning it into a hovercraft that allows him to travel on the square to the astonishment of everyone around.

Image 

But St. Marks Square is only one of the many wonders to be admired here. Looking across from St. Marks Square is the magnificent baroque Basilica of St. Mary of Health (Basilica di Santa Maria della Salute), a huge, domed church built on a spit between St. Mark’s Basin and the Grand Canal. It was founded in 1630 as a tribute to the Virgin Mary and took 57 years to complete. It was built as a tribute to the Virgin Mary for freeing the city from the plague. And every year on November 21 the locals pay tribute to her, praying for good health.

 

Venice is literally built on water and the people have learned to live with regular floods. But in recent years the frequency of those floods has increased. Last year the city was flooded several times. A group of mobile flood barriers have been constructed at the entrance to the Venice lagoon in a project started ten years ago and scheduled to be completed in 2015. http://goo.gl/axO9rb

 

Will it be enough?

 

The city once boasted several hundred thousand local inhabitants. Now it is just over 50,000. It is not only the high property prices but the cost and discomfort of having to protect your house against the flood waters that is driving the people away. The first exodus began after the catastrophic flood of November 1966 that virtually submerged the city. At the same time more than 20 million tourists came to the city every year. As a major generator of tourist income the city is worth protecting.

 

Meanwhile another United Nations Climate Conference is taking place in Poland of all places. The country has shown little inclination in the past to do anything about curbing carbon dioxide emissions from its coal-fired power stations. To the contrary it is taking the tack of many climate change sceptics. The outcome of this conference is predictable. Too little is being done too late and the longer we wait, the more difficult it is going to get to save cities like Venice and many low-lying island nations.

 

There seems to be a parallel between the denial ism in the climate debate and personal health. It is beyond doubt that smoking, junk food and lack of exercise will shorten your life. But the human being seems incapable of relating such information to the future. “So what, as long as I can enjoy my Bic Mac in front of the TV now…”

 

In the same way we ignore the warnings from climate scientists that if we don’t radically reduce emissions we are going to have a very hot and uncomfortable planet by the end of this century. We are playing roulette with ourselves and the future of our children. Its time to wake up!

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized